On Sat, 6 Oct 2012, Daniel Santos wrote:
> These are based against -mm, where another commit is already in that
> changes it. I was told that since that commit was already in -mm, to
> not include it in the patch set:
>
> 6c620cf1536a0ce6a83ecaaaf05298dcc0f7d440 (committed 2012-09-27)
>
> This
On 10/06/2012 12:42 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> @@ -56,10 +65,3 @@
>> #define __visible __attribute__((externally_visible))
>> #endif
>>
>> -#if __GNUC_MINOR__ > 0
>> -#define __compiletime_object_size(obj) __builtin_object_size(obj, 0)
>> -#endif
>> -#if __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 3 && !defined(__CHE
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 02:42:40PM -0500, danielfsan...@att.net wrote:
> This helps to keep the file from getting confusing, removes one
> duplicate version check and should encourage future editors to put new
> macros where they belong.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Santos
> Acked-by: David Rientjes
This helps to keep the file from getting confusing, removes one
duplicate version check and should encourage future editors to put new
macros where they belong.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Santos
Acked-by: David Rientjes
---
include/linux/compiler-gcc4.h | 20 +++-
1 files changed,
4 matches
Mail list logo