On 2020/6/24 15:54, Vinod Koul wrote:
On 09-06-20, 09:14, Sugar Zhang wrote:
There is no reason to limit the performance on the 'NO-FLUSHP' SoCs,
cuz these platforms are just that the 'FLUSHP' instruction is broken.
Lets not use terms like cuz... 'because' is perfect term :)
It can
On 09-06-20, 09:14, Sugar Zhang wrote:
> There is no reason to limit the performance on the 'NO-FLUSHP' SoCs,
> cuz these platforms are just that the 'FLUSHP' instruction is broken.
Lets not use terms like cuz... 'because' is perfect term :)
It can rephrased to:
There is no reason to limit the
There is no reason to limit the performance on the 'NO-FLUSHP' SoCs,
cuz these platforms are just that the 'FLUSHP' instruction is broken.
so, remove the limit to improve the efficiency.
Signed-off-by: Sugar Zhang
---
Changes in v2: None
drivers/dma/pl330.c | 34
3 matches
Mail list logo