> -Original Message-
> From: Logan Gunthorpe
> Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 6:22 PM
>
>
> On 2020-06-03 10:04 a.m., Stankiewicz, Piotr wrote:
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Logan Gunthorpe
> >> Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 5:48 PM
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2020-06-03 5:44
On 2020-06-03 10:04 a.m., Stankiewicz, Piotr wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Logan Gunthorpe
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 5:48 PM
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2020-06-03 5:44 a.m., Piotr Stankiewicz wrote:
>>> When debugging an issue where I was asking the PCI machinery to enable a
>>> set
> -Original Message-
> From: Logan Gunthorpe
> Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 5:48 PM
>
>
>
> On 2020-06-03 5:44 a.m., Piotr Stankiewicz wrote:
> > When debugging an issue where I was asking the PCI machinery to enable a
> > set of MSI-X vectors, without falling back on MSI, I ran
On 2020-06-03 5:44 a.m., Piotr Stankiewicz wrote:
> When debugging an issue where I was asking the PCI machinery to enable a
> set of MSI-X vectors, without falling back on MSI, I ran across a
> behaviour which seems odd. The pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity() will
> always return -ENOSPC on
When debugging an issue where I was asking the PCI machinery to enable a
set of MSI-X vectors, without falling back on MSI, I ran across a
behaviour which seems odd. The pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity() will
always return -ENOSPC on failure, when allocating MSI-X vectors only,
whereas with MSI
5 matches
Mail list logo