于 2013/12/24 23:05, Joe Perches 写道:
> On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 22:35 +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
>> 于 2013/12/24 22:22, Joe Perches 写道:
>>> On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 19:27 +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
Use possibly more efficient ether_addr_equal_unaligned
and ether_addr_equal to instead of memcmp
On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 22:35 +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
> 于 2013/12/24 22:22, Joe Perches 写道:
> > On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 19:27 +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
> >> Use possibly more efficient ether_addr_equal_unaligned
> >> and ether_addr_equal to instead of memcmp.
> >
> > A negative of adding so many
于 2013/12/24 22:22, Joe Perches 写道:
> On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 19:27 +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
>> Use possibly more efficient ether_addr_equal_unaligned
>> and ether_addr_equal to instead of memcmp.
>
> A negative of adding so many different drivers in a single
> patch is that you miss sending patc
On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 19:27 +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
> Use possibly more efficient ether_addr_equal_unaligned
> and ether_addr_equal to instead of memcmp.
A negative of adding so many different drivers in a single
patch is that you miss sending patches to the named maintainers.
Most of these b
Use possibly more efficient ether_addr_equal_unaligned
and ether_addr_equal to instead of memcmp.
Cc: "David S. Miller"
Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
5 matches
Mail list logo
