On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 09:31:41AM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:
> From: Zhang Yanfei
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/20] vmcore: refer to e_phoff member explicitly
> Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 14:46:31 +0800
>
> > 于 2013年03月05日 15:35, Zhang Yanfei 写道:
> >> 于 2013年03月02日
From: Zhang Yanfei
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/20] vmcore: refer to e_phoff member explicitly
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 14:46:31 +0800
> 于 2013年03月05日 15:35, Zhang Yanfei 写道:
>> 于 2013年03月02日 16:35, HATAYAMA Daisuke 写道:
>
> One minor suggestion.
>
> Previously, when the
于 2013年03月05日 15:35, Zhang Yanfei 写道:
> 于 2013年03月02日 16:35, HATAYAMA Daisuke 写道:
>> Code around /proc/vmcore currently assumes program header table is
>> next to ELF header. But future change can break the assumption on
>> kexec-tools and the 1st kernel. To avoid worst case, now refer to
>> e_phof
于 2013年03月02日 16:35, HATAYAMA Daisuke 写道:
> Code around /proc/vmcore currently assumes program header table is
> next to ELF header. But future change can break the assumption on
> kexec-tools and the 1st kernel. To avoid worst case, now refer to
> e_phoff member that indicates position of program
Code around /proc/vmcore currently assumes program header table is
next to ELF header. But future change can break the assumption on
kexec-tools and the 1st kernel. To avoid worst case, now refer to
e_phoff member that indicates position of program header table in
file-offset.
Signed-off-by: HATAY
5 matches
Mail list logo