On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 08:51:06AM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> On 15.12.2016 08:09, Karl Beldan wrote:
> >>> I think this should also go into -stable.
> >>
> >> Why? Do you have real use cases that are broken by this? I understand
> >
> > I do, some code adding partitions on a gluebi master
On 15.12.2016 08:09, Karl Beldan wrote:
>>> I think this should also go into -stable.
>>
>> Why? Do you have real use cases that are broken by this? I understand
>
> I do, some code adding partitions on a gluebi master.
What exactly are you doing?
>> this is a problem, but I'm curious on how thi
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 9:09 PM, Brian Norris
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 07:24:46PM +, Karl Beldan wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 8:16 PM, Brian Norris
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:15:31PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 11:43:56 +0200
>> >> Danie
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 10:12:42PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> On 14.12.2016 22:09, Brian Norris wrote:
> > Also, note that this isn't a regression; it's been broken forever and
> > apparently no one noticed. IMO that raises the bar a bit (but not
> > impossibly so) for -stable.
>
> Yes. AF
Hi!
On 14.12.2016 22:09, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 07:24:46PM +, Karl Beldan wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 8:16 PM, Brian Norris
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:15:31PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 11:43:56 +0200
Daniel Walter w
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 07:24:46PM +, Karl Beldan wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 8:16 PM, Brian Norris
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:15:31PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> >> On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 11:43:56 +0200
> >> Daniel Walter wrote:
> >>
> >> > From: Richard Weinberger
> >> >
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 8:16 PM, Brian Norris
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:15:31PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 11:43:56 +0200
>> Daniel Walter wrote:
>>
>> > From: Richard Weinberger
>> >
>> > If the master device has callbacks for _get/put_device()
>> > and this
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:15:31PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 11:43:56 +0200
> Daniel Walter wrote:
>
> > From: Richard Weinberger
> >
> > If the master device has callbacks for _get/put_device()
> > and this MTD has slaves a get_mtd_device() call on paritions
> > will
On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 11:43:56 +0200
Daniel Walter wrote:
> From: Richard Weinberger
>
> If the master device has callbacks for _get/put_device()
> and this MTD has slaves a get_mtd_device() call on paritions
> will never issue the registered callbacks.
> Fix this by propagating _get/put_device()
From: Richard Weinberger
If the master device has callbacks for _get/put_device()
and this MTD has slaves a get_mtd_device() call on paritions
will never issue the registered callbacks.
Fix this by propagating _get/put_device() down.
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberge
10 matches
Mail list logo