Hello Laxman,
Thanks a lot for your feedback and acks.
On 01/22/2016 06:39 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
On Friday 22 January 2016 01:53 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
It is better to use the ARRAY_SIZE() macro instead of the array length
to avoid bugs if the array is later changed and the
On Friday 22 January 2016 01:53 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
It is better to use the ARRAY_SIZE() macro instead of the array length
to avoid bugs if the array is later changed and the length not updated.
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Acked-
On 22.01.2016 05:23, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> It is better to use the ARRAY_SIZE() macro instead of the array length
> to avoid bugs if the array is later changed and the length not updated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
>
> ---
Tested
It is better to use the ARRAY_SIZE() macro instead of the array length
to avoid bugs if the array is later changed and the length not updated.
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
---
Changes in v2:
- Add Krzysztof Kozlowski's Reviewed-by tag to patch #2.
4 matches
Mail list logo