On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 11:51:08AM -0500, Jon Mason wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Serge Semin wrote:
> > The dma_mask and dma_coherent_mask fields of the NTB struct device
> > weren't initialized in hardware drivers. In fact it should be done
> > instead of PCIe interface usage, since
On 05/12/17 09:51 AM, Jon Mason wrote:
On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Serge Semin wrote:
The dma_mask and dma_coherent_mask fields of the NTB struct device
weren't initialized in hardware drivers. In fact it should be done
instead of PCIe interface usage, since NTB clients are supposed to
us
On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Serge Semin wrote:
> The dma_mask and dma_coherent_mask fields of the NTB struct device
> weren't initialized in hardware drivers. In fact it should be done
> instead of PCIe interface usage, since NTB clients are supposed to
> use NTB API only and left unaware of r
The dma_mask and dma_coherent_mask fields of the NTB struct device
weren't initialized in hardware drivers. In fact it should be done
instead of PCIe interface usage, since NTB clients are supposed to
use NTB API only and left unaware of real hardware implementation.
In addition to that ntb_device_
4 matches
Mail list logo