On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 03:44:12PM -0500, Alan Tull wrote:
> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 3:44 AM, Wu, Hao wrote:
> >> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Alan Tull wrote:
> >> > On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 6:58 AM, Wu Hao wrote:
> >> >> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 09:09:47AM -0500, Alan Tull wrote:
> >> >>> Add t
Hi Alan,
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Alan Tull wrote:
> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Moritz Fischer wrote:
>> Hi Alan,
>>
>> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Alan Tull wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Moritz Fischer wrote:
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Alan Tull wrote:
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Alan Tull wrote:
>> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Moritz Fischer wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Alan Tull wrote:
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 3:44 AM, Wu, Hao wrote:
>> On Wed,
Hi Alan,
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Alan Tull wrote:
> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Moritz Fischer wrote:
>> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Alan Tull wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 3:44 AM, Wu, Hao wrote:
> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Alan Tull wrote:
> > On Wed, May 3
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Alan Tull wrote:
>> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 3:44 AM, Wu, Hao wrote:
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Alan Tull wrote:
> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 6:58 AM, Wu Hao wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Alan Tull wrote:
> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 3:44 AM, Wu, Hao wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Alan Tull wrote:
>>> > On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 6:58 AM, Wu Hao wrote:
>>> >> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 09:09:47AM -0500, Alan Tull wrote:
>>> >>> Add two functions
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 3:44 AM, Wu, Hao wrote:
>> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Alan Tull wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 6:58 AM, Wu Hao wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 09:09:47AM -0500, Alan Tull wrote:
>> >>> Add two functions for getting the FPGA bridge from the device
>> >>> rathe
> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Alan Tull wrote:
> > On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 6:58 AM, Wu Hao wrote:
> >> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 09:09:47AM -0500, Alan Tull wrote:
> >>> Add two functions for getting the FPGA bridge from the device
> >>> rather than device tree node. This is to enable writing c
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Alan Tull wrote:
> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 6:58 AM, Wu Hao wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 09:09:47AM -0500, Alan Tull wrote:
>>> Add two functions for getting the FPGA bridge from the device
>>> rather than device tree node. This is to enable writing code
>>> th
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 03:07:33PM -0500, Alan Tull wrote:
> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 6:58 AM, Wu Hao wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 09:09:47AM -0500, Alan Tull wrote:
> >> Add two functions for getting the FPGA bridge from the device
> >> rather than device tree node. This is to enable writing
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 6:58 AM, Wu Hao wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 09:09:47AM -0500, Alan Tull wrote:
>> Add two functions for getting the FPGA bridge from the device
>> rather than device tree node. This is to enable writing code
>> that will support using FPGA bridges without device tree.
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 09:09:47AM -0500, Alan Tull wrote:
> Add two functions for getting the FPGA bridge from the device
> rather than device tree node. This is to enable writing code
> that will support using FPGA bridges without device tree.
> Rename one old function to make it clear that it i
Add two functions for getting the FPGA bridge from the device
rather than device tree node. This is to enable writing code
that will support using FPGA bridges without device tree.
Rename one old function to make it clear that it is device
tree-ish. This leaves us with 3 functions for getting a b
13 matches
Mail list logo
