On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Alan Tull wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Wu Hao wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> I was hoping to pick your brain a bit on a DT question.
>>
>>> During FPGA device (e.g PCI-based) discovery, platform dev
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Wu Hao wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 04:04:44PM -0500, Alan Tull wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 3:43 AM, Wu Hao wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 04:40:16PM -0500, Alan Tull wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> >> > On Thu, Ju
On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 04:04:44PM -0500, Alan Tull wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 3:43 AM, Wu Hao wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 04:40:16PM -0500, Alan Tull wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Alan Tull wrote:
> >> >> On
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 3:43 AM, Wu Hao wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 04:40:16PM -0500, Alan Tull wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Alan Tull wrote:
>> >> On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Wu Hao wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Rob,
>> >
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 04:40:16PM -0500, Alan Tull wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Alan Tull wrote:
> >> On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Wu Hao wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Rob,
> >>
> >> I was hoping to pick your brain a bit on a DT qu
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Alan Tull wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Wu Hao wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> I was hoping to pick your brain a bit on a DT question.
>>
>>> During FPGA device (e.g PCI-based) discovery, platform dev
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:44:01AM -0500, Alan Tull wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Wu Hao wrote:
> > During FPGA device (e.g PCI-based) discovery, platform devices are
> > registered for different FPGA function units. But the device node path
> > isn't quite friendly to applications.
>
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Alan Tull wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Wu Hao wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> I was hoping to pick your brain a bit on a DT question.
>
>> During FPGA device (e.g PCI-based) discovery, platform devices are
>> registered for different FPGA function units. But
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Wu Hao wrote:
> During FPGA device (e.g PCI-based) discovery, platform devices are
> registered for different FPGA function units. But the device node path
> isn't quite friendly to applications.
>
Hi Hao,
Please add a document for fpga-dev under Documentation/fp
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Wu Hao wrote:
Hi Rob,
I was hoping to pick your brain a bit on a DT question.
> During FPGA device (e.g PCI-based) discovery, platform devices are
> registered for different FPGA function units. But the device node path
> isn't quite friendly to applications.
>
During FPGA device (e.g PCI-based) discovery, platform devices are
registered for different FPGA function units. But the device node path
isn't quite friendly to applications.
Consider this case, applications want to access child device's sysfs file
for some information.
1) Access using bus-based
11 matches
Mail list logo