Christophe Leroy <christophe.le...@c-s.fr> writes:

> Le 26/04/2019 à 17:58, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
>> Book3E 64 is the only subarch not using pte_fragment. In order
>> to allow refactorisation, this patch converts it to pte_fragment.
>> 
>> Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.ku...@linux.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.le...@c-s.fr>
>> ---
>>   arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h       |  6 -----
>>   arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/64/mmu.h     |  4 +++-
>>   arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/64/pgalloc.h | 33 
>> ++++++++++------------------
>>   arch/powerpc/mm/Makefile                     |  4 ++--
>>   arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context.c                |  2 +-
>>   5 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>> 
> [...]
>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/mm/Makefile
>> index 3c1bd9fa23cd..138c772d58d1 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/Makefile
>> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ CFLAGS_REMOVE_slb.o = $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE)
>>   
>>   obj-y                              := fault.o mem.o pgtable.o mmap.o \
>>                                 init_$(BITS).o pgtable_$(BITS).o \
>> +                               pgtable-frag.o \
>>                                 init-common.o mmu_context.o drmem.o
>>   obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_MMU_NOHASH)       += mmu_context_nohash.o tlb_nohash.o \
>>                                 tlb_nohash_low.o
>> @@ -17,8 +18,7 @@ hash64-$(CONFIG_PPC_NATIVE)        := hash_native_64.o
>>   obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3E_64)   += pgtable-book3e.o
>>   obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64)        += pgtable-hash64.o hash_utils_64.o 
>> slb.o \
>>                                 $(hash64-y) mmu_context_book3s64.o \
>> -                               pgtable-book3s64.o pgtable-frag.o
>> -obj-$(CONFIG_PPC32)         += pgtable-frag.o
>> +                               pgtable-book3s64.o
>
> Looks like the removal of pgtable-frag.o for CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64 didn't 
> survive the merge.

Hmm, I don't remember having problems there but clearly something went
wrong.

> Will send a patch to fix that.

Thanks.

cheers

Reply via email to