Re: [PATCH v2 04/14] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Reorder remove()

W dniu 30.03.2021 o 04:53, Douglas Anderson pisze: > Let's make the remove() function strictly the reverse of the probe() > function so it's easier to reason about. > > NOTES: > - The MIPI calls probably belong in detach() but will be moved in a >separate patch. The mipi is incorrectly hand

[PATCH v2 04/14] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Reorder remove()

Let's make the remove() function strictly the reverse of the probe() function so it's easier to reason about. NOTES: - The MIPI calls probably belong in detach() but will be moved in a separate patch. - The cached EDID freeing isn't actually part of probe but needs to be in remove to avoid orp