On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 03:22:50AM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> No functional changes, preparation.
>
> Add the new helper, find_next_ret_chain(), which finds the first !chained
> entry and returns its ->next. Yes, it is suboptimal. We probably want to
> turn ->chained into ->start_of_this_chain
No functional changes, preparation.
Add the new helper, find_next_ret_chain(), which finds the first !chained
entry and returns its ->next. Yes, it is suboptimal. We probably want to
turn ->chained into ->start_of_this_chain pointer and avoid another loop.
But this needs the boring changes in dup_
2 matches
Mail list logo