On Fri, 2019-05-03 at 06:09 -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 12:20:17AM +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > On Thu, 2019-05-02 at 15:12 -0600, Heitke, Kenneth wrote:
> > > On 5/2/2019 5:47 AM, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > > > +static void nvme_ext_queue_free(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl,
On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 12:20:17AM +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-05-02 at 15:12 -0600, Heitke, Kenneth wrote:
> > On 5/2/2019 5:47 AM, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > > +static void nvme_ext_queue_free(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, u16 qid)
> > > +{
> > > + struct nvme_dev *dev =
On Thu, 2019-05-02 at 15:12 -0600, Heitke, Kenneth wrote:
>
> On 5/2/2019 5:47 AM, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > Note that currently the number of hw queues reserved for mdev,
> > has to be pre determined on module load.
> >
> > (I used to allocate the queues dynamicaly on demand, but
> > recent
On 5/2/2019 5:47 AM, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
Note that currently the number of hw queues reserved for mdev,
has to be pre determined on module load.
(I used to allocate the queues dynamicaly on demand, but
recent changes to allocate polled/read queues made
this somewhat difficult, so I dropped
On Thu, 2019-05-02 at 14:47 +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> Note that currently the number of hw queues reserved for mdev,
> has to be pre determined on module load.
>
> (I used to allocate the queues dynamicaly on demand, but
> recent changes to allocate polled/read queues made
> this somewhat
Note that currently the number of hw queues reserved for mdev,
has to be pre determined on module load.
(I used to allocate the queues dynamicaly on demand, but
recent changes to allocate polled/read queues made
this somewhat difficult, so I dropped this for now)
Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky
6 matches
Mail list logo
