On 02/04/2016 07:14 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
El 4/2/16 a les 11:04, David Vrabel ha escrit:
On 01/02/16 15:38, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
HVMlite guests need to be viewed as having APIC, otherwise smpboot code,
for example, will complain.
I think we should consider always giving HVMlite guests a
El 4/2/16 a les 11:04, David Vrabel ha escrit:
> On 01/02/16 15:38, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> HVMlite guests need to be viewed as having APIC, otherwise smpboot code,
>> for example, will complain.
>
> I think we should consider always giving HVMlite guests an emulated
> APIC. I think this elimin
On 01/02/16 15:38, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> HVMlite guests need to be viewed as having APIC, otherwise smpboot code,
> for example, will complain.
I think we should consider always giving HVMlite guests an emulated
APIC. I think this eliminates one of the biggest differences between
HVMlite and n
HVMlite guests need to be viewed as having APIC, otherwise smpboot code,
for example, will complain.
Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky
---
Not sure about xen_cpu_present_to_apicid() being an identity function, given
xen_x86_32_early_logical_apicid().
Suspend/resume will cause xen_apic_write() warn
4 matches
Mail list logo
