Hi Guennadi,
On Monday 22 July 2013 08:34:19 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jul 2013, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Friday 19 July 2013 18:29:34 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > Currently shdma DT nodes have to be placed under a multiplexer node. DMA
> > > slave DT nodes then use tha
Hi Laurent
Thanks for the comments
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Guennadi,
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> On Friday 19 July 2013 18:29:34 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > Currently shdma DT nodes have to be placed under a multiplexer node. DMA
> > slave DT nodes then use tha
Hi Guennadi,
Thanks for the patch.
On Friday 19 July 2013 18:29:34 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Currently shdma DT nodes have to be placed under a multiplexer node. DMA
> slave DT nodes then use that multiplexer's phandle in their "dmas"
> properties. However, sometimes it can be necessary to l
Currently shdma DT nodes have to be placed under a multiplexer node. DMA
slave DT nodes then use that multiplexer's phandle in their "dmas"
properties. However, sometimes it can be necessary to let DMA slaves only
use a specific DMAC instance. In this case it would be logical to just use
the respec
4 matches
Mail list logo