On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 18:16:43 +0100, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> If dobj->control is not initialized we end up in an OOPs during
> skl_tplg_complete:
>
> [ 26.553358] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address:
> 0078
> [ 26.561151] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> [ 2
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 06:16:43PM +0100, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> If dobj->control is not initialized we end up in an OOPs during
> skl_tplg_complete:
>
> [ 26.553358] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address:
> 0078
> [ 26.561151] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
>
Thanks Ricardo - I have checked it on Eve/Google Pixelbook
Tested-by: Lukasz Majczak
czw., 21 sty 2021 o 18:33 Rojewski, Cezary
napisał(a):
>
> On 2021-01-21 6:16 PM, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> > If dobj->control is not initialized we end up in an OOPs during
> > skl_tplg_complete:
> >
> > [ 26
On 2021-01-21 6:16 PM, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> If dobj->control is not initialized we end up in an OOPs during
> skl_tplg_complete:
>
> [ 26.553358] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address:
> 0078
> [ 26.561151] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> [ 26.566897] #PF
Hi,
This is just a v2 from my patch from December with the ={}: in a second patch.
Best regards!
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 6:16 PM Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
>
> If dobj->control is not initialized we end up in an OOPs during
> skl_tplg_complete:
>
> [ 26.553358] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereferen
If dobj->control is not initialized we end up in an OOPs during
skl_tplg_complete:
[ 26.553358] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address:
0078
[ 26.561151] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
[ 26.566897] #PF: error_code(0x) - not-present page
[ 26.572642] PGD 0
6 matches
Mail list logo