[Sorry everyone for the late response, I went away on vacation and pushed this
off until I returned.]
On 12/13/2017 07:45 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> [+Mark, Graeme]
>
> In $SUBJECT, s/avialable/available
>
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 10:50:58AM -0500, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>> Other architectu
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 08:08:08AM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On 12/14/17 4:30 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> >>I didn't want to put any ACPI code in amba-pl011.c, so putting it in spcr.c
> >>made the most sense. I agree the global variable is ugly. If you have a
> >>better idea, I'm all ears.
>
On 12/14/17 4:30 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
I didn't want to put any ACPI code in amba-pl011.c, so putting it in spcr.c
made the most sense. I agree the global variable is ugly. If you have a
better idea, I'm all ears.
I told you my idea. It could have been made easier by reusing the
ACPI_
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 03:11:33PM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On 12/13/2017 06:45 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> >>+/*
> >>+ * Erratum 44 for QDF2432v1 and QDF2400v1 SoCs describes the BUSY bit as
> >>+ * occasionally getting stuck as 1. To avoid the potential for a hang,
> >>check
> >>+ * TXFE ==
On 12/13/2017 06:45 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
+/*
+ * Erratum 44 for QDF2432v1 and QDF2400v1 SoCs describes the BUSY bit as
+ * occasionally getting stuck as 1. To avoid the potential for a hang, check
+ * TXFE == 0 instead of BUSY == 1. This may not be suitable for all UART
+ * implementation
[+Mark, Graeme]
In $SUBJECT, s/avialable/available
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 10:50:58AM -0500, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> Other architectures can use SPCR to setup an early console or console
> but the current code is ARM64 specific.
I see nothing ARM64 specific in current code (apart from some
ACPI
[adding Lorenzo, Sudeep and Hanjun -- see Rafael's comment below]
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 01:22:59AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, December 11, 2017 4:50:58 PM CET Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> > Other architectures can use SPCR to setup an early console or console
> > but the current co
On Monday, December 11, 2017 4:50:58 PM CET Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> Other architectures can use SPCR to setup an early console or console
> but the current code is ARM64 specific.
>
> Change the name of parse_spcr() to acpi_parse_spcr(). Add a weak
> function acpi_arch_setup_console() that can b
Other architectures can use SPCR to setup an early console or console
but the current code is ARM64 specific.
Change the name of parse_spcr() to acpi_parse_spcr(). Add a weak
function acpi_arch_setup_console() that can be used for arch-specific
setup. Move flags into ACPI code. Update the Docum
9 matches
Mail list logo
