On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 08:59:15PM +, Alexandru Moise wrote:
> The value of num_items that start_transaction() ultimately
> always takes is a small one, so a 64 bit integer is overkill.
>
> Also change num_items for btrfs_start_transaction() and
> btrfs_start_transaction_lflush() as well.
>
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 08:59:15PM +, Alexandru Moise wrote:
> The value of num_items that start_transaction() ultimately
> always takes is a small one, so a 64 bit integer is overkill.
>
> Also change num_items for btrfs_start_transaction() and
> btrfs_start_transaction_lflush() as well.
>
The value of num_items that start_transaction() ultimately
always takes is a small one, so a 64 bit integer is overkill.
Also change num_items for btrfs_start_transaction() and
btrfs_start_transaction_lflush() as well.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Moise <00moses.alexande...@gmail.com>
---
v2:
The value of num_items that start_transaction() ultimately
always takes is a small one, so a 64 bit integer is overkill.
Also change num_items for btrfs_start_transaction() and
btrfs_start_transaction_lflush() as well.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Moise <00moses.alexande...@gmail.com>
---
v2:
4 matches
Mail list logo