On 03/06/2017 01:17 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
>
> On 06-03-2017 10:41, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> On 03/03/2017 06:22 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
>>> Hi Neil,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 03-03-2017 16:42, Neil Armstrong wrote:
Sure, I was meaning the *input* format the controller receives from the
On 03/06/2017 01:17 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
>
> On 06-03-2017 10:41, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> On 03/03/2017 06:22 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
>>> Hi Neil,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 03-03-2017 16:42, Neil Armstrong wrote:
Sure, I was meaning the *input* format the controller receives from the
Hi Neil,
On 06-03-2017 10:41, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> On 03/03/2017 06:22 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
>> Hi Neil,
>>
>>
>> On 03-03-2017 16:42, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>>> Sure, I was meaning the *input* format the controller receives from the
>>> pixel encoder, I'm quite sure the format is strict.
>>>
Hi Neil,
On 06-03-2017 10:41, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> On 03/03/2017 06:22 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
>> Hi Neil,
>>
>>
>> On 03-03-2017 16:42, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>>> Sure, I was meaning the *input* format the controller receives from the
>>> pixel encoder, I'm quite sure the format is strict.
>>>
On 03/03/2017 06:22 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
>
> On 03-03-2017 16:42, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>>
>> Sure, I was meaning the *input* format the controller receives from the
>> pixel encoder, I'm quite sure the format is strict.
>>
>
> Hmm, not quite following you here. As far as the
On 03/03/2017 06:22 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
>
> On 03-03-2017 16:42, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>>
>> Sure, I was meaning the *input* format the controller receives from the
>> pixel encoder, I'm quite sure the format is strict.
>>
>
> Hmm, not quite following you here. As far as the
Hi Neil,
On 03-03-2017 16:42, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>
> Sure, I was meaning the *input* format the controller receives from the
> pixel encoder, I'm quite sure the format is strict.
>
Hmm, not quite following you here. As far as the controller goes
it supports the formats I mentioned:
-
Hi Neil,
On 03-03-2017 16:42, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>
> Sure, I was meaning the *input* format the controller receives from the
> pixel encoder, I'm quite sure the format is strict.
>
Hmm, not quite following you here. As far as the controller goes
it supports the formats I mentioned:
-
Hi Neil,
On 03-03-2017 11:31, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>
> Sure, but I was struggling about finding an equivalence.
>
> How should I replace these ?
>
> DW_HDMI_ENC_FMT_RGB
> DW_HDMI_ENC_FMT_YCBCR444
> DW_HDMI_ENC_FMT_YCBCR422_16BITS
> DW_HDMI_ENC_FMT_YCBCR422_8BITS
> DW_HDMI_ENC_FMT_XVYCC444
>
> I
Hi Neil,
On 03-03-2017 11:31, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>
> Sure, but I was struggling about finding an equivalence.
>
> How should I replace these ?
>
> DW_HDMI_ENC_FMT_RGB
> DW_HDMI_ENC_FMT_YCBCR444
> DW_HDMI_ENC_FMT_YCBCR422_16BITS
> DW_HDMI_ENC_FMT_YCBCR422_8BITS
> DW_HDMI_ENC_FMT_XVYCC444
>
> I
On 03/03/2017 05:39 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
>
> On 03-03-2017 11:31, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>>
>> Sure, but I was struggling about finding an equivalence.
>>
>> How should I replace these ?
>>
>> DW_HDMI_ENC_FMT_RGB
>> DW_HDMI_ENC_FMT_YCBCR444
>> DW_HDMI_ENC_FMT_YCBCR422_16BITS
>>
On 03/03/2017 05:39 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
>
> On 03-03-2017 11:31, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>>
>> Sure, but I was struggling about finding an equivalence.
>>
>> How should I replace these ?
>>
>> DW_HDMI_ENC_FMT_RGB
>> DW_HDMI_ENC_FMT_YCBCR444
>> DW_HDMI_ENC_FMT_YCBCR422_16BITS
>>
On 03/02/2017 04:45 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Thursday 02 Mar 2017 16:29:31 Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> Some display pipelines can only provide non-RBG input pixels to the HDMI TX
>> Controller, this patch takes the pixel format from the plat_data if
On 03/02/2017 04:45 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Thursday 02 Mar 2017 16:29:31 Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> Some display pipelines can only provide non-RBG input pixels to the HDMI TX
>> Controller, this patch takes the pixel format from the plat_data if
Hi Neil,
Thank you for the patch.
On Thursday 02 Mar 2017 16:29:31 Neil Armstrong wrote:
> Some display pipelines can only provide non-RBG input pixels to the HDMI TX
> Controller, this patch takes the pixel format from the plat_data if
> provided.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong
Hi Neil,
Thank you for the patch.
On Thursday 02 Mar 2017 16:29:31 Neil Armstrong wrote:
> Some display pipelines can only provide non-RBG input pixels to the HDMI TX
> Controller, this patch takes the pixel format from the plat_data if
> provided.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong
> ---
>
Some display pipelines can only provide non-RBG input pixels to the HDMI TX
Controller, this patch takes the pixel format from the plat_data if provided.
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong
---
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw-hdmi.c | 59
Some display pipelines can only provide non-RBG input pixels to the HDMI TX
Controller, this patch takes the pixel format from the plat_data if provided.
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong
---
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw-hdmi.c | 59
18 matches
Mail list logo