Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] interconnect: Add sync state support

2020-07-31 Thread Mike Tipton
On 7/30/2020 12:07 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:18 PM Mike Tipton wrote: On 7/22/2020 10:07 AM, Saravana Kannan wrote: On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 4:01 AM Georgi Djakov wrote: The bootloaders often do some initial configuration of the interconnects in the system and we

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] interconnect: Add sync state support

2020-07-30 Thread Saravana Kannan
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:18 PM Mike Tipton wrote: > > On 7/22/2020 10:07 AM, Saravana Kannan wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 4:01 AM Georgi Djakov > > wrote: > >> > >> The bootloaders often do some initial configuration of the interconnects > >> in the system and we want to keep this config

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] interconnect: Add sync state support

2020-07-27 Thread Mike Tipton
On 7/22/2020 10:07 AM, Saravana Kannan wrote: On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 4:01 AM Georgi Djakov wrote: The bootloaders often do some initial configuration of the interconnects in the system and we want to keep this configuration until all consumers have probed and expressed their bandwidth needs.

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] interconnect: Add sync state support

2020-07-22 Thread Saravana Kannan
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 4:01 AM Georgi Djakov wrote: > > The bootloaders often do some initial configuration of the interconnects > in the system and we want to keep this configuration until all consumers > have probed and expressed their bandwidth needs. This is because we don't > want to change

[PATCH v2 1/2] interconnect: Add sync state support

2020-07-22 Thread Georgi Djakov
The bootloaders often do some initial configuration of the interconnects in the system and we want to keep this configuration until all consumers have probed and expressed their bandwidth needs. This is because we don't want to change the configuration by starting to disable unused paths until ever