On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 12:11 AM Chris Packham
wrote:
>
> On 18/06/19 10:08 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 5:26 AM Chris Packham
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> Ping?
> >
> > Your patch is not lost. We start soon with collecting all material for
> > the merge win
On 18/06/19 10:08 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 5:26 AM Chris Packham
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Ping?
>
> Your patch is not lost. We start soon with collecting all material for
> the merge window. :-)
>
OK thanks for the confirmation and sorry for the noise.
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 5:26 AM Chris Packham
wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Ping?
Your patch is not lost. We start soon with collecting all material for
the merge window. :-)
--
Thanks,
//richard
Hi All,
Ping?
On 23/05/19 11:19 AM, Chris Packham wrote:
> concat_lock() and concat_unlock() only differed in terms of the mtd_xx
> operation they called. Refactor them to use a common helper function and
> pass a boolean flag to indicate whether lock or unlock is needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chri
concat_lock() and concat_unlock() only differed in terms of the mtd_xx
operation they called. Refactor them to use a common helper function and
pass a boolean flag to indicate whether lock or unlock is needed.
Signed-off-by: Chris Packham
---
Changes in v2:
- Use a boolean flag instead of passing
5 matches
Mail list logo