Hi Brian,
On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 06:49:38PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> cros_ec_get_next_event() is documented to return 0 for success and
> negative for errors. It currently returns negative for some errors, and
> non-negative (number of bytes received) for success (including some "no
> data
Hi Brian,
On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 06:49:38PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> cros_ec_get_next_event() is documented to return 0 for success and
> negative for errors. It currently returns negative for some errors, and
> non-negative (number of bytes received) for success (including some "no
> data
On Wed, 07 Nov 2018, Brian Norris wrote:
> cros_ec_get_next_event() is documented to return 0 for success and
> negative for errors. It currently returns negative for some errors, and
> non-negative (number of bytes received) for success (including some "no
> data available" responses as zero).
On Wed, 07 Nov 2018, Brian Norris wrote:
> cros_ec_get_next_event() is documented to return 0 for success and
> negative for errors. It currently returns negative for some errors, and
> non-negative (number of bytes received) for success (including some "no
> data available" responses as zero).
cros_ec_get_next_event() is documented to return 0 for success and
negative for errors. It currently returns negative for some errors, and
non-negative (number of bytes received) for success (including some "no
data available" responses as zero). This mostly works out OK, because the
callers were
cros_ec_get_next_event() is documented to return 0 for success and
negative for errors. It currently returns negative for some errors, and
non-negative (number of bytes received) for success (including some "no
data available" responses as zero). This mostly works out OK, because the
callers were
6 matches
Mail list logo
