Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] rcu: Update documentation of rcu_read_unlock()

2018-05-28 Thread Anna-Maria Gleixner
On Fri, 25 May 2018, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 11:05:06AM +0200, Anna-Maria Gleixner wrote: > > Since commit b4abf91047cf ("rtmutex: Make wait_lock irq safe") the > > explanation in rcu_read_unlock() documentation about irq unsafe rtmutex > > wait_lock is no longer valid.

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] rcu: Update documentation of rcu_read_unlock()

2018-05-28 Thread Anna-Maria Gleixner
On Fri, 25 May 2018, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 11:05:06AM +0200, Anna-Maria Gleixner wrote: > > Since commit b4abf91047cf ("rtmutex: Make wait_lock irq safe") the > > explanation in rcu_read_unlock() documentation about irq unsafe rtmutex > > wait_lock is no longer valid.

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] rcu: Update documentation of rcu_read_unlock()

2018-05-25 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 11:05:06AM +0200, Anna-Maria Gleixner wrote: > Since commit b4abf91047cf ("rtmutex: Make wait_lock irq safe") the > explanation in rcu_read_unlock() documentation about irq unsafe rtmutex > wait_lock is no longer valid. > > Remove it to prevent kernel developers reading

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] rcu: Update documentation of rcu_read_unlock()

2018-05-25 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 11:05:06AM +0200, Anna-Maria Gleixner wrote: > Since commit b4abf91047cf ("rtmutex: Make wait_lock irq safe") the > explanation in rcu_read_unlock() documentation about irq unsafe rtmutex > wait_lock is no longer valid. > > Remove it to prevent kernel developers reading

[PATCH v2 1/2] rcu: Update documentation of rcu_read_unlock()

2018-05-25 Thread Anna-Maria Gleixner
Since commit b4abf91047cf ("rtmutex: Make wait_lock irq safe") the explanation in rcu_read_unlock() documentation about irq unsafe rtmutex wait_lock is no longer valid. Remove it to prevent kernel developers reading the documentation to rely on it. Suggested-by: Eric W. Biederman

[PATCH v2 1/2] rcu: Update documentation of rcu_read_unlock()

2018-05-25 Thread Anna-Maria Gleixner
Since commit b4abf91047cf ("rtmutex: Make wait_lock irq safe") the explanation in rcu_read_unlock() documentation about irq unsafe rtmutex wait_lock is no longer valid. Remove it to prevent kernel developers reading the documentation to rely on it. Suggested-by: Eric W. Biederman Signed-off-by: