On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:49:15AM -0700, Aaron Brice wrote:
> Previous algorithm had an outer loop with the values {2,3,5,7} and an
> inner loop with {2,4,6,8,16,32,...,32768}, and would pick the first
> value over the required scaling value (where the total scale was the two
> numbers
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:49:15AM -0700, Aaron Brice wrote:
Previous algorithm had an outer loop with the values {2,3,5,7} and an
inner loop with {2,4,6,8,16,32,...,32768}, and would pick the first
value over the required scaling value (where the total scale was the two
numbers multiplied).
Previous algorithm had an outer loop with the values {2,3,5,7} and an
inner loop with {2,4,6,8,16,32,...,32768}, and would pick the first
value over the required scaling value (where the total scale was the two
numbers multiplied).
Since the inner loop went up to 32768 it would always pick a
Previous algorithm had an outer loop with the values {2,3,5,7} and an
inner loop with {2,4,6,8,16,32,...,32768}, and would pick the first
value over the required scaling value (where the total scale was the two
numbers multiplied).
Since the inner loop went up to 32768 it would always pick a
4 matches
Mail list logo
