Ard Biesheuvel writes:
> On 5 January 2017 at 10:15, Nicolai Stange wrote:
>> So, are you Ok with only taking the other review comment, namely
>>
>> "modify efi_fake_memmap() to use your new efi_memmap_alloc() function
>>for consistency"
>>
>> into account for a v3?
>>
>
> Yes, that should
On 5 January 2017 at 10:15, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> Ard Biesheuvel writes:
>
>> On 5 January 2017 at 07:42, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>
>>> * Nicolai Stange wrote:
>>>
Matt Fleming writes:
> On Thu, 22 Dec, at 11:23:39AM, Nicolai Stange wrote:
>> So, after memblock is gone, allo
Ard Biesheuvel writes:
> On 5 January 2017 at 07:42, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> * Nicolai Stange wrote:
>>
>>> Matt Fleming writes:
>>>
>>> > On Thu, 22 Dec, at 11:23:39AM, Nicolai Stange wrote:
>>> >> So, after memblock is gone, allocations should be done through
>>> >> the "normal"
>>> >> page
On 5 January 2017 at 07:42, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Nicolai Stange wrote:
>
>> Matt Fleming writes:
>>
>> > On Thu, 22 Dec, at 11:23:39AM, Nicolai Stange wrote:
>> >> So, after memblock is gone, allocations should be done through the
>> >> "normal"
>> >> page allocator. Introduce a helper, efi
On 01/05/17 at 08:42am, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Nicolai Stange wrote:
>
> > Matt Fleming writes:
> >
> > > On Thu, 22 Dec, at 11:23:39AM, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> > >> So, after memblock is gone, allocations should be done through the
> > >> "normal"
> > >> page allocator. Introduce a helper,
* Nicolai Stange wrote:
> Matt Fleming writes:
>
> > On Thu, 22 Dec, at 11:23:39AM, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> >> So, after memblock is gone, allocations should be done through the "normal"
> >> page allocator. Introduce a helper, efi_memmap_alloc() for this. Use
> >> it from efi_arch_mem_reserve
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:23 AM, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> With commit 4bc9f92e64c8 ("x86/efi-bgrt: Use efi_mem_reserve() to avoid
> copying image data"), efi_bgrt_init() calls into the memblock allocator
> through efi_mem_reserve() => efi_arch_mem_reserve() *after* mm_init()
> has been called.
>
>
Matt Fleming writes:
> On Thu, 22 Dec, at 11:23:39AM, Nicolai Stange wrote:
>> So, after memblock is gone, allocations should be done through the "normal"
>> page allocator. Introduce a helper, efi_memmap_alloc() for this. Use
>> it from efi_arch_mem_reserve() and from efi_free_boot_services() as
On Thu, 22 Dec, at 11:23:39AM, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> With commit 4bc9f92e64c8 ("x86/efi-bgrt: Use efi_mem_reserve() to avoid
> copying image data"), efi_bgrt_init() calls into the memblock allocator
> through efi_mem_reserve() => efi_arch_mem_reserve() *after* mm_init()
> has been called.
>
> In
With commit 4bc9f92e64c8 ("x86/efi-bgrt: Use efi_mem_reserve() to avoid
copying image data"), efi_bgrt_init() calls into the memblock allocator
through efi_mem_reserve() => efi_arch_mem_reserve() *after* mm_init()
has been called.
Indeed, KASAN reports a bad read access later on in
efi_free_boot_s
10 matches
Mail list logo
