Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] fpga: Add flag to indicate bitstream needs decrypting

2017-02-22 Thread Michal Simek
On 22.2.2017 14:04, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 09:22:19AM +0100, Michal Simek wrote: >> On 22.2.2017 08:15, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:26:17PM -0600, Alan Tull wrote: On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Alan Tull Hi Greg, >>>

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] fpga: Add flag to indicate bitstream needs decrypting

2017-02-22 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 09:22:19AM +0100, Michal Simek wrote: > On 22.2.2017 08:15, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:26:17PM -0600, Alan Tull wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Alan Tull > >> > >> Hi Greg, > >> > >> Would it be helpful for us to resend patches fo

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] fpga: Add flag to indicate bitstream needs decrypting

2017-02-22 Thread Michal Simek
On 22.2.2017 08:15, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:26:17PM -0600, Alan Tull wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Alan Tull >> >> Hi Greg, >> >> Would it be helpful for us to resend patches for you to take with you >> on cc? Or is it enough that they are on lkml? >

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] fpga: Add flag to indicate bitstream needs decrypting

2017-02-21 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:26:17PM -0600, Alan Tull wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Alan Tull > > Hi Greg, > > Would it be helpful for us to resend patches for you to take with you > on cc? Or is it enough that they are on lkml? Yes, please send patches with your signed-off-by: for

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] fpga: Add flag to indicate bitstream needs decrypting

2017-02-21 Thread Michal Simek
On 21.2.2017 19:26, Alan Tull wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Alan Tull > > Hi Greg, > > Would it be helpful for us to resend patches for you to take with you > on cc? Or is it enough that they are on lkml? Can I know the reason for this? I know that there were some discussion in pa

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] fpga: Add flag to indicate bitstream needs decrypting

2017-02-21 Thread Alan Tull
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Michal Simek wrote: > On 21.2.2017 19:26, Alan Tull wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Alan Tull >> >> Hi Greg, >> >> Would it be helpful for us to resend patches for you to take with you >> on cc? Or is it enough that they are on lkml? > > Can I know t

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] fpga: Add flag to indicate bitstream needs decrypting

2017-02-21 Thread Alan Tull
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Alan Tull Hi Greg, Would it be helpful for us to resend patches for you to take with you on cc? Or is it enough that they are on lkml? Thanks, Alan Tull wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 7:55 AM, Michal Simek wrote: >> On 20.2.2017 21:55, m...@kernel.org wrot

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] fpga: Add flag to indicate bitstream needs decrypting

2017-02-21 Thread Alan Tull
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 7:55 AM, Michal Simek wrote: > On 20.2.2017 21:55, m...@kernel.org wrote: >> From: Moritz Fischer >> >> Add a flag that is passed to the write_init() callback, indicating >> that the bitstream is encrypted. >> >> The low-level driver will deal with the flag, or return an e

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] fpga: Add flag to indicate bitstream needs decrypting

2017-02-21 Thread Michal Simek
On 20.2.2017 21:55, m...@kernel.org wrote: > From: Moritz Fischer > > Add a flag that is passed to the write_init() callback, indicating > that the bitstream is encrypted. > > The low-level driver will deal with the flag, or return an error, > if encrypted bitstreams are not supported. > > Sign

[PATCH v2 1/3] fpga: Add flag to indicate bitstream needs decrypting

2017-02-20 Thread mdf
From: Moritz Fischer Add a flag that is passed to the write_init() callback, indicating that the bitstream is encrypted. The low-level driver will deal with the flag, or return an error, if encrypted bitstreams are not supported. Signed-off-by: Moritz Fischer Cc: Alan Tull Cc: Michal Simek C