On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 01:09:42PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 03-08-16 12:50:49, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 06:00:26PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Tue 02-08-16 18:00:48, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> > ...
> > > > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 10:12:03AM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 02:46:40PM +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
...
> > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > index 1c0aa59fd333..8c8e68becee9 100644
> > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > @@ -4044,7
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 10:31:16PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 02-08-16 13:33:37, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 06:00:26PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Tue 02-08-16 18:00:48, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> > > > @@ -5767,15 +5785,20 @@ void mem_cgroup_swapout(struct p
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 06:00:26PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 02-08-16 18:00:48, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
...
> > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > index 3be791afd372..4ae12effe347 100644
> > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > @@ -4036,6 +4036,24 @@ static
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 02:46:40PM +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 01:09:42PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 03-08-16 12:50:49, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 06:00:26PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > On Tue 02-08-16 18:00:48, Vladimir Davy
On Wed 03-08-16 14:46:40, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 01:09:42PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 03-08-16 12:50:49, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 06:00:26PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > On Tue 02-08-16 18:00:48, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> > >
On Wed 03-08-16 12:50:49, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 06:00:26PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Tue 02-08-16 18:00:48, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> ...
> > > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > > index 3be791afd372..4ae12effe347 100644
> > > --- a/mm/memcontrol.
On Tue 02-08-16 13:33:37, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 06:00:26PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Tue 02-08-16 18:00:48, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> > > @@ -5767,15 +5785,20 @@ void mem_cgroup_swapout(struct page *page,
> > > swp_entry_t entry)
> > > if (!memcg)
> > >
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 06:00:48PM +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> An offline memory cgroup might have anonymous memory or shmem left
> charged to it and no swap. Since only swap entries pin the id of an
> offline cgroup, such a cgroup will have no id and so an attempt to
> swapout its anon/shmem
An offline memory cgroup might have anonymous memory or shmem left
charged to it and no swap. Since only swap entries pin the id of an
offline cgroup, such a cgroup will have no id and so an attempt to
swapout its anon/shmem will not store memory cgroup info in the swap
cgroup map. As a result, mem
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 06:00:26PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 02-08-16 18:00:48, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> > @@ -5767,15 +5785,20 @@ void mem_cgroup_swapout(struct page *page,
> > swp_entry_t entry)
> > if (!memcg)
> > return;
> >
> > - mem_cgroup_id_get(memcg);
> > -
On Tue 02-08-16 18:00:48, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> An offline memory cgroup might have anonymous memory or shmem left
> charged to it and no swap. Since only swap entries pin the id of an
> offline cgroup, such a cgroup will have no id and so an attempt to
> swapout its anon/shmem will not store m
12 matches
Mail list logo
