Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] net-gianfar: Less function calls in gfar_ethflow_to_filer_table() after error detection

This is not the proper way to resubmit patches when you are asked to make changes to some portion of a multi-patch series. You must always resubmit the entire series when this happens, not just the patch that changes. And in the revised cover "0/N" posting you list the revisions that were made.

[PATCH v2 1/3] net-gianfar: Less function calls in gfar_ethflow_to_filer_table() after error detection

From: Markus Elfring Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2016 13:56:09 +0100 The kfree() function was called in one case by the gfar_ethflow_to_filer_table() function during error handling even if a passed variable contained a null pointer. * Return directly if a memory allocation failed at the beginning. *

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] net-gianfar: Less function calls in gfar_ethflow_to_filer_table() after error detection

This is not the proper way to resubmit patches when you are asked to make changes to some portion of a multi-patch series. You must always resubmit the entire series when this happens, not just the patch that changes. And in the revised cover "0/N" posting you list the revisions that were made.

[PATCH v2 1/3] net-gianfar: Less function calls in gfar_ethflow_to_filer_table() after error detection

From: Markus Elfring Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2016 13:56:09 +0100 The kfree() function was called in one case by the gfar_ethflow_to_filer_table() function during error handling even if a passed variable contained a null pointer. * Return directly if a memory allocation