Em Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 09:20:21AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 06:08:52PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 07:57:49AM -0700, David Ahern escreveu:
> > > On 1/14/15 4:18 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > > static inline struct annotation *sy
Hi Arnaldo and David,
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 06:08:52PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 07:57:49AM -0700, David Ahern escreveu:
> > On 1/14/15 4:18 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> >
> > >@@ -129,8 +124,7 @@ static inline struct sym_hist
> > >*annotation__histogram(str
Em Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 07:57:49AM -0700, David Ahern escreveu:
> On 1/14/15 4:18 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
> >@@ -129,8 +124,7 @@ static inline struct sym_hist
> >*annotation__histogram(struct annotation *notes, i
> >
> > static inline struct annotation *symbol__annotation(struct symbol *sym)
>
On 1/14/15 4:18 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
@@ -129,8 +124,7 @@ static inline struct sym_hist *annotation__histogram(struct
annotation *notes, i
static inline struct annotation *symbol__annotation(struct symbol *sym)
{
- struct sannotation *a = container_of(sym, struct sannotation, symbo
Em Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 08:18:05PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> Currently the symbol structure is allocated with symbol_conf.priv_size
> to carry sideband information like annotation, map browser on TUI and
> sort-by-name tree node. So retrieving these information from symbol
> needs to care ab
Currently the symbol structure is allocated with symbol_conf.priv_size
to carry sideband information like annotation, map browser on TUI and
sort-by-name tree node. So retrieving these information from symbol
needs to care about the details of such placement.
However the annotation code just assu
6 matches
Mail list logo
