Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] clk: Extract OF clock helpers in

2018-04-16 Thread Stephen Boyd
Quoting Geert Uytterhoeven (2018-04-10 05:51:37) > The use of of_clk_get_parent_{count,name}() and of_clk_init() is not > limited to clock providers. > > Hence move these helpers into their own header file, so callers that are > not clock providers no longer have to include . > > Suggested-by: St

Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] clk: Extract OF clock helpers in

2018-04-13 Thread Rob Herring
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 02:51:37PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > The use of of_clk_get_parent_{count,name}() and of_clk_init() is not > limited to clock providers. > > Hence move these helpers into their own header file, so callers that are > not clock providers no longer have to include . >

Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] clk: Extract OF clock helpers in

2018-04-10 Thread Heiko Stuebner
Am Dienstag, 10. April 2018, 14:51:37 CEST schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven: > The use of of_clk_get_parent_{count,name}() and of_clk_init() is not > limited to clock providers. > > Hence move these helpers into their own header file, so callers that are > not clock providers no longer have to include .

[PATCH v2 1/5] clk: Extract OF clock helpers in

2018-04-10 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
The use of of_clk_get_parent_{count,name}() and of_clk_init() is not limited to clock providers. Hence move these helpers into their own header file, so callers that are not clock providers no longer have to include . Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven --- v2: - New.