Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: at24: consistently document the compatible property

2017-12-26 Thread Bartosz Golaszewski
2017-12-26 22:32 GMT+01:00 Rob Herring : > On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 05:58:29PM +0100, Peter Rosin wrote: >> On 2017-12-22 00:38, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> > Hello Peter, >> > >> > On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 12:07 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: >> >> On 2017-12-21 21:27, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote

Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: at24: consistently document the compatible property

2017-12-26 Thread Rob Herring
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 05:58:29PM +0100, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2017-12-22 00:38, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > > Hello Peter, > > > > On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 12:07 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: > >> On 2017-12-21 21:27, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > >>> Hello Peter, > >>> > >>> On Thu, Dec 21

Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: at24: consistently document the compatible property

2017-12-22 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2017-12-22 00:38, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Hello Peter, > > On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 12:07 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: >> On 2017-12-21 21:27, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >>> Hello Peter, >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: On 2017-12-21 14:48, Bartosz Gola

Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: at24: consistently document the compatible property

2017-12-21 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
Hello Peter, On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 12:07 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2017-12-21 21:27, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> Hello Peter, >> >> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: >>> On 2017-12-21 14:48, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: Current description of the compatible proper

Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: at24: consistently document the compatible property

2017-12-21 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2017-12-21 21:27, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Hello Peter, > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: >> On 2017-12-21 14:48, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >>> Current description of the compatible property for at24 is quite vague. >>> >>> Specify an exact list of accepted comp

Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: at24: consistently document the compatible property

2017-12-21 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
Hello Peter, On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2017-12-21 14:48, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >> Current description of the compatible property for at24 is quite vague. >> >> Specify an exact list of accepted compatibles and document the - now >> deprecated - strings which we

Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: at24: consistently document the compatible property

2017-12-21 Thread David Lechner
On 12/21/2017 11:24 AM, David Lechner wrote: Also, at,24c08 is listed in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trivial-devices.txt. It should probably be removed. And st,24c256

Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: at24: consistently document the compatible property

2017-12-21 Thread David Lechner
On 12/21/2017 10:20 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: On 2017-12-21 14:48, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: Current description of the compatible property for at24 is quite vague. Specify an exact list of accepted compatibles and document the - now deprecated - strings which were previously used in device tree

Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: at24: consistently document the compatible property

2017-12-21 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2017-12-21 14:48, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > Current description of the compatible property for at24 is quite vague. > > Specify an exact list of accepted compatibles and document the - now > deprecated - strings which were previously used in device tree files. Why is it suddenly deprecated

Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: at24: consistently document the compatible property

2017-12-21 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > Current description of the compatible property for at24 is quite vague. > > Specify an exact list of accepted compatibles and document the - now > deprecated - strings which were previously used in device tree files. > + will still wo

[PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: at24: consistently document the compatible property

2017-12-21 Thread Bartosz Golaszewski
Current description of the compatible property for at24 is quite vague. Specify an exact list of accepted compatibles and document the - now deprecated - strings which were previously used in device tree files. Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas --- Docume