Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] gpiolib / ACPI: move acpi_gpiochip_free_interrupts next to the request function

2013-10-14 Thread Alexandre Courbot
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 11:58 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Linus Walleij >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Mika Westerberg >>> wrote: >>> It makes more sense to have these functions

Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] gpiolib / ACPI: move acpi_gpiochip_free_interrupts next to the request function

2013-10-14 Thread Mika Westerberg
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 08:58:05AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Linus Walleij > > wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Mika Westerberg > >> wrote: > >> > >>> It makes more sense to have

Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] gpiolib / ACPI: move acpi_gpiochip_free_interrupts next to the request function

2013-10-14 Thread Linus Walleij
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Linus Walleij > wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Mika Westerberg >> wrote: >> >>> It makes more sense to have these functions close to each other. No >>> functional changes. >>> >>>

Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] gpiolib / ACPI: move acpi_gpiochip_free_interrupts next to the request function

2013-10-14 Thread Linus Walleij
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Alexandre Courbot gnu...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org wrote: On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Mika Westerberg mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com wrote: It makes more sense to have these functions

Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] gpiolib / ACPI: move acpi_gpiochip_free_interrupts next to the request function

2013-10-14 Thread Mika Westerberg
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 08:58:05AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Alexandre Courbot gnu...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org wrote: On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Mika Westerberg

Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] gpiolib / ACPI: move acpi_gpiochip_free_interrupts next to the request function

2013-10-14 Thread Alexandre Courbot
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 11:58 PM, Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org wrote: On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Alexandre Courbot gnu...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org wrote: On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Mika Westerberg

Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] gpiolib / ACPI: move acpi_gpiochip_free_interrupts next to the request function

2013-10-11 Thread Alexandre Courbot
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Mika Westerberg > wrote: > >> It makes more sense to have these functions close to each other. No >> functional changes. >> >> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg >> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki > > So I've

Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] gpiolib / ACPI: move acpi_gpiochip_free_interrupts next to the request function

2013-10-11 Thread Linus Walleij
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Mika Westerberg wrote: > It makes more sense to have these functions close to each other. No > functional changes. > > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki So I've applied this first patch, and I'm just waiting for Alexandre's ACK on

Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] gpiolib / ACPI: move acpi_gpiochip_free_interrupts next to the request function

2013-10-11 Thread Linus Walleij
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Mika Westerberg mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com wrote: It makes more sense to have these functions close to each other. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki

Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] gpiolib / ACPI: move acpi_gpiochip_free_interrupts next to the request function

2013-10-11 Thread Alexandre Courbot
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org wrote: On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Mika Westerberg mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com wrote: It makes more sense to have these functions close to each other. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg

[PATCH v2 1/5] gpiolib / ACPI: move acpi_gpiochip_free_interrupts next to the request function

2013-10-10 Thread Mika Westerberg
It makes more sense to have these functions close to each other. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c | 76 ++--- 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) diff --git

[PATCH v2 1/5] gpiolib / ACPI: move acpi_gpiochip_free_interrupts next to the request function

2013-10-10 Thread Mika Westerberg
It makes more sense to have these functions close to each other. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com --- drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c | 76 ++--- 1 file