> On Jun 14, 2019, at 2:16 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 16:06:19 -0500
> Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>
>>> It's not cool to remove people's SOB.
>>> It's Song's patch. His should be first and your second.
>>
>> His original patch didn't have an SOB. I preserved the "From"
On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 16:06:19 -0500
Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > It's not cool to remove people's SOB.
> > It's Song's patch. His should be first and your second.
>
> His original patch didn't have an SOB. I preserved the "From" field.
Then it can't be accepted. It needs an SOB from the
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 01:56:15PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 12:56:40PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > From: Song Liu
> >
> > The stacktrace_map_raw_tp BPF selftest is failing because the RIP saved
> > by perf_arch_fetch_caller_regs() isn't getting saved by
> >
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 12:56:40PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> From: Song Liu
>
> The stacktrace_map_raw_tp BPF selftest is failing because the RIP saved
> by perf_arch_fetch_caller_regs() isn't getting saved by
> perf_callchain_kernel().
>
> This was broken by the following commit:
>
>
From: Song Liu
The stacktrace_map_raw_tp BPF selftest is failing because the RIP saved
by perf_arch_fetch_caller_regs() isn't getting saved by
perf_callchain_kernel().
This was broken by the following commit:
d15d356887e7 ("perf/x86: Make perf callchains work without
CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER")
5 matches
Mail list logo