Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] coresight: etm-perf: Clarify comment on perf options

2021-02-03 Thread Leo Yan
Hi Suzuki, On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 11:00:42PM +, Suzuki Kuruppassery Poulose wrote: > Hi Leo > > On 2/2/21 4:38 PM, Leo Yan wrote: > > In theory, the options should be arbitrary values and are neutral for > > any ETM version; so far perf tool uses ETMv3.5/PTM ETMCR config bits > > except for

Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] coresight: etm-perf: Clarify comment on perf options

2021-02-02 Thread Suzuki K Poulose
Hi Leo On 2/2/21 4:38 PM, Leo Yan wrote: In theory, the options should be arbitrary values and are neutral for any ETM version; so far perf tool uses ETMv3.5/PTM ETMCR config bits except for register's bit definitions, also uses as options. This can introduce confusion, especially if we want to

[PATCH v2 1/7] coresight: etm-perf: Clarify comment on perf options

2021-02-02 Thread Leo Yan
In theory, the options should be arbitrary values and are neutral for any ETM version; so far perf tool uses ETMv3.5/PTM ETMCR config bits except for register's bit definitions, also uses as options. This can introduce confusion, especially if we want to add a new option but the new option is not