Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] cpufreq: move invariance setter calls in cpufreq core

2020-08-03 Thread Ionela Voinescu
Hi Rafael, On Monday 03 Aug 2020 at 15:46:59 (+0200), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 3:26 PM Ionela Voinescu > wrote: > > > > Hi guys, > > > > On Thursday 30 Jul 2020 at 09:11:28 (+0530), Viresh Kumar wrote: > > > On 27-07-20, 15:48, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > On Wed,

Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] cpufreq: move invariance setter calls in cpufreq core

2020-08-03 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 3:26 PM Ionela Voinescu wrote: > > Hi guys, > > On Thursday 30 Jul 2020 at 09:11:28 (+0530), Viresh Kumar wrote: > > On 27-07-20, 15:48, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 11:38 AM Ionela Voinescu > > > wrote: > > > > diff --git

Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] cpufreq: move invariance setter calls in cpufreq core

2020-08-03 Thread Ionela Voinescu
Hi guys, On Thursday 30 Jul 2020 at 09:11:28 (+0530), Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 27-07-20, 15:48, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 11:38 AM Ionela Voinescu > > wrote: > > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > > > index 036f4cc42ede..bac4101546db

Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] cpufreq: move invariance setter calls in cpufreq core

2020-07-29 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 27-07-20, 15:48, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 11:38 AM Ionela Voinescu > wrote: > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > > index 036f4cc42ede..bac4101546db 100644 > > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > >

Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] cpufreq: move invariance setter calls in cpufreq core

2020-07-29 Thread Ionela Voinescu
Hi Rafael, On Monday 27 Jul 2020 at 15:48:39 (+0200), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 11:38 AM Ionela Voinescu > wrote: [..] > > target() > > === > > This has been flagged as deprecated since: > > > > commit 9c0ebcf78fde ("cpufreq: Implement light weight ->target_index()

Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] cpufreq: move invariance setter calls in cpufreq core

2020-07-27 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 11:38 AM Ionela Voinescu wrote: > > From: Valentin Schneider > > To properly scale its per-entity load-tracking signals, the task scheduler > needs to be given a frequency scale factor, i.e. some image of the current > frequency the CPU is running at. Currently, this

[PATCH v2 1/7] cpufreq: move invariance setter calls in cpufreq core

2020-07-22 Thread Ionela Voinescu
From: Valentin Schneider To properly scale its per-entity load-tracking signals, the task scheduler needs to be given a frequency scale factor, i.e. some image of the current frequency the CPU is running at. Currently, this scale can be computed either by using counters (APERF/MPERF on x86, AMU