On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Daniel]
>
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 05:19:38PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>
>> > Why are we reading these BARs directly anyway? These look like
>> > standard PCI BARs (I810_GMADD
[+cc Daniel]
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 05:19:38PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> > Why are we reading these BARs directly anyway? These look like
> > standard PCI BARs (I810_GMADDR == 0x10 and I915_GMADDR == 0x18), so
> > the PCI core should a
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> Why are we reading these BARs directly anyway? These look like
> standard PCI BARs (I810_GMADDR == 0x10 and I915_GMADDR == 0x18), so
> the PCI core should already be reading them correctly, shouldn't it?
> Can't we just use pcibios_resource
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> That bar could be 64bit pref mem and above 4G.
>
> -v2: refresh to 3.13-rc1
>
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu
> Cc: David Airlie
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter
> ---
> drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c | 14 ++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertio
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> Doesn't that mean that this series should be reordered so this patch
> is *before* patches 5-9 to avoid bisection breakage? I know you've
> split up and reposted parts of the series, but the question still
> applies.
Yes, you are right.
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>> That bar could be 64bit pref mem and above 4G.
>>>
>>> -v2: refresh to 3.13-rc1
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu
>>> Cc: David A
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> That bar could be 64bit pref mem and above 4G.
>>
>> -v2: refresh to 3.13-rc1
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu
>> Cc: David Airlie
>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter
>
> This looks OK to me.
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> That bar could be 64bit pref mem and above 4G.
>
> -v2: refresh to 3.13-rc1
>
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu
> Cc: David Airlie
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter
This looks OK to me. Does it depend on any previous patches in this
series? If not, I
That bar could be 64bit pref mem and above 4G.
-v2: refresh to 3.13-rc1
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu
Cc: David Airlie
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter
---
drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c | 14 ++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c b/dri
9 matches
Mail list logo
