On 08/10/15 12:08, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 06:02:01PM +0100, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
+ /*
+* second pass allows enable() invoked on active each CPU
+* to consider interacting capabilities.
+*/
This comment doesn't read properly.
Fixed lo
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 06:02:01PM +0100, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
> @@ -647,16 +648,119 @@ void check_cpu_capabilities(const struct
> arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps,
> cpus_set_cap(caps[i].capability);
> }
>
> - /* second pass allows enable() to consider interacting capabi
On 06/10/15 05:41, kbuild test robot wrote:
Hi Suzuki,
[auto build test ERROR on v4.3-rc4 -- if it's inappropriate base, please ignore]
config: arm64-alldefconfig (attached as .config)
reproduce:
wget
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross
Hi Suzuki,
[auto build test ERROR on v4.3-rc4 -- if it's inappropriate base, please ignore]
config: arm64-alldefconfig (attached as .config)
reproduce:
wget
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross
-O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/ma
At the moment we run through the arm64_features capability list for
each CPU and set the capability if one of the CPU supports it. This
could be problematic in a heterogeneous system with differing capabilities.
Delay the CPU feature checks until all the enabled CPUs are up, so that
we can make bet
5 matches
Mail list logo