On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 07:35:55AM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 04:17:25PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > We can't be sure the paths are actually properly deactivated when a
> > tunnel is restarted after resume.
>
> Why can't we be sure? Please provide proper reasoning.
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 04:17:25PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> We can't be sure the paths are actually properly deactivated when a
> tunnel is restarted after resume.
Why can't we be sure? Please provide proper reasoning.
> So instead of marking all paths as
> inactive we go ahead and deact
We can't be sure the paths are actually properly deactivated when a
tunnel is restarted after resume. So instead of marking all paths as
inactive we go ahead and deactivate them explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg
---
drivers/thunderbolt/tunnel.c | 9 -
1 file changed, 8 insertion
3 matches
Mail list logo