On 2018/2/1 16:53, Marc Zyngier wrote:
[...]
... and actually, perhaps it makes sense for the
SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1 check to be completely independent of MIDR
based errata matching?
I.e., if SMCCC v1.1 and SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1 are both implemented,
we should proba
On 01/02/18 02:40, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2018/1/31 23:05, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 31/01/18 14:38, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>> On 31 January 2018 at 14:35, Ard Biesheuvel
>>> wrote:
On 31 January 2018 at 14:11, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 31/01/18 13:56, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> Hi Marc,
>
On 2018/2/1 10:40, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2018/1/31 23:05, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 31/01/18 14:38, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>> On 31 January 2018 at 14:35, Ard Biesheuvel
>>> wrote:
On 31 January 2018 at 14:11, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 31/01/18 13:56, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> Hi Marc,
>
On 2018/1/31 23:05, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 31/01/18 14:38, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 31 January 2018 at 14:35, Ard Biesheuvel
>> wrote:
>>> On 31 January 2018 at 14:11, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On 31/01/18 13:56, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> On 2018/1/30 1:45, Marc Zyngier wr
On 31/01/18 14:38, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 31 January 2018 at 14:35, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 31 January 2018 at 14:11, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> On 31/01/18 13:56, Hanjun Guo wrote:
Hi Marc,
On 2018/1/30 1:45, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> static int enable_psci_bp_hardening(void
On 31 January 2018 at 14:35, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 31 January 2018 at 14:11, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 31/01/18 13:56, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>> Hi Marc,
>>>
>>> On 2018/1/30 1:45, Marc Zyngier wrote:
static int enable_psci_bp_hardening(void *data)
{
const struct arm64_cpu_
On 31 January 2018 at 14:11, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 31/01/18 13:56, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> Hi Marc,
>>
>> On 2018/1/30 1:45, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> static int enable_psci_bp_hardening(void *data)
>>> {
>>> const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry = data;
>>>
>>> -if (psci_ops.get_ver
On 31/01/18 13:56, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> On 2018/1/30 1:45, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> static int enable_psci_bp_hardening(void *data)
>> {
>> const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry = data;
>>
>> -if (psci_ops.get_version)
>> +if (psci_ops.get_version) {
>> +
Hi Marc,
On 2018/1/30 1:45, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> static int enable_psci_bp_hardening(void *data)
> {
> const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry = data;
>
> - if (psci_ops.get_version)
> + if (psci_ops.get_version) {
> + if (check_smccc_arch_workaround_1(entry))
> +
On 29/01/18 19:41, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 29 January 2018 at 17:45, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> Add the detection and runtime code for ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1.
>> It is lovely. Really.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_psci.h | 63 +
On 29 January 2018 at 17:45, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Add the detection and runtime code for ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1.
> It is lovely. Really.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_psci.h | 63
> arch/arm64/kernel/bpi.S
Add the detection and runtime code for ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1.
It is lovely. Really.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_psci.h | 63
arch/arm64/kernel/bpi.S | 20
arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c| 68 +
12 matches
Mail list logo
