Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] clocksource: don't suspend/resume when unused

2015-01-20 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Fri, 16 Jan 2015, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > There is no point in calling suspend/resume for unused > clocksources. That's true, but > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni > --- > kernel/time/clocksource.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] clocksource: don't suspend/resume when unused

2015-01-20 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Fri, 16 Jan 2015, Alexandre Belloni wrote: There is no point in calling suspend/resume for unused clocksources. That's true, but Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni alexandre.bell...@free-electrons.com --- kernel/time/clocksource.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2

[PATCH v2 2/2] clocksource: don't suspend/resume when unused

2015-01-16 Thread Alexandre Belloni
There is no point in calling suspend/resume for unused clocksources. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni --- kernel/time/clocksource.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/time/clocksource.c b/kernel/time/clocksource.c index 03cfc5a08e3b..da65b3b73a86

[PATCH v2 2/2] clocksource: don't suspend/resume when unused

2015-01-16 Thread Alexandre Belloni
There is no point in calling suspend/resume for unused clocksources. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni alexandre.bell...@free-electrons.com --- kernel/time/clocksource.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/time/clocksource.c b/kernel/time/clocksource.c