Hi Peter,
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 5:13 AM, Peter Crosthwaite
wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Harini Katakam
> wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 4:44 AM, Peter Crosthwaite
>> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Harini Katakam
>>> wrote:
Hi,
On Fri,
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Harini Katakam
wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 4:44 AM, Peter Crosthwaite
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Harini Katakam
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Harini Katakam
>>> wrote:
Hi Mark,
On Fri,
Hi Peter,
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 4:44 AM, Peter Crosthwaite
wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Harini Katakam
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Harini Katakam
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Mark,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 a
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Harini Katakam
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Harini Katakam
> wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 05:44:23PM +0530, Harini Katakam wrote:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Ma
Hi Mark,
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 07:38:14PM +0530, Harini Katakam wrote:
>
>> OK. I understand.
>> Can you comment on the case where a decoder is used?
>
>> There is support for adding a decoder where extended slaves can be selected
>> through t
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 07:38:14PM +0530, Harini Katakam wrote:
> OK. I understand.
> Can you comment on the case where a decoder is used?
> There is support for adding a decoder where extended slaves can be selected
> through the IP's control register.
> (This is not currently implemented in the
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Harini Katakam
wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 05:44:23PM +0530, Harini Katakam wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> > On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 08:30:38AM +0530, Har
Hi Mark,
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 05:44:23PM +0530, Harini Katakam wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>> > On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 08:30:38AM +0530, Harini Katakam wrote:
>
>> >> This IP can drive 4 slaves.
>> >> The CS
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 05:44:23PM +0530, Harini Katakam wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 08:30:38AM +0530, Harini Katakam wrote:
> >> This IP can drive 4 slaves.
> >> The CS line to be driven is selected in spi device structure and
> >> that
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Peter Crosthwaite
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:14 PM, Harini Katakam
> wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 08:30:38AM +0530, Harini Katakam wrote:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:04 AM, Ma
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:14 PM, Harini Katakam
wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 08:30:38AM +0530, Harini Katakam wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:04 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> > On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 04:40:31PM +0530, Harini
Hi Mark,
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 08:30:38AM +0530, Harini Katakam wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:04 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
>> > On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 04:40:31PM +0530, Harini Katakam wrote:
>
>> >> +Optional properties:
>> >> +- num-cs
On 04/04/2014 10:09 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Harini,
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 5:00 AM, Harini Katakam
> wrote:
+ num-cs = /bits/ 16 <4>;
>>>
>>> What's going on with the /bits/ - is this something that's required for
>>> the property?
>>
>> The master->num-chipselect
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 08:30:38AM +0530, Harini Katakam wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:04 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 04:40:31PM +0530, Harini Katakam wrote:
> >> +Optional properties:
> >> +- num-cs : Number of chip selects used.
> > How does this translate
Hi Harini,
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 5:00 AM, Harini Katakam
wrote:
>>> + num-cs = /bits/ 16 <4>;
>>
>> What's going on with the /bits/ - is this something that's required for
>> the property?
>
> The master->num-chipselect property is 16 bit but writing <4> here directly
> leads to 0 be
Hi Mark,
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:04 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 04:40:31PM +0530, Harini Katakam wrote:
>
>> +Optional properties:
>> +- num-cs : Number of chip selects used.
>
> How does this translate to the hardware?
This IP can drive 4 slaves.
The CS line to
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 04:40:31PM +0530, Harini Katakam wrote:
> +Optional properties:
> +- num-cs : Number of chip selects used.
How does this translate to the hardware?
> + num-cs = /bits/ 16 <4>;
What's going on with the /bits/ - is this something that's required for
Add spi-cadence bindings documentation.
Signed-off-by: Harini Katakam
---
v2 changes:
- Separate patch for bindings.
- Add xilinx compatible string; Make compatible string first in the node.
- Use property name num-cs. Make this property optional.
---
.../devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-cadence.tx
18 matches
Mail list logo
