Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] genirq: Allow irq_desc to carry the union of stacked irq_chip flags

2015-01-23 Thread Jiang Liu
On 2015/1/23 23:55, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, Marc Zyngier wrote: > >> The current infrastructure for stacked domains doesn't propagate >> irq_chip flags, and as we only look at the top-level irq_chip, >> we may miss a number of critical flags. >> >> This patch accumulates the

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] genirq: Allow irq_desc to carry the union of stacked irq_chip flags

2015-01-23 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, Marc Zyngier wrote: > The current infrastructure for stacked domains doesn't propagate > irq_chip flags, and as we only look at the top-level irq_chip, > we may miss a number of critical flags. > > This patch accumulates the flags into a new set, stored at the > irq_desc leve

[PATCH v2 2/2] genirq: Allow irq_desc to carry the union of stacked irq_chip flags

2015-01-14 Thread Marc Zyngier
The current infrastructure for stacked domains doesn't propagate irq_chip flags, and as we only look at the top-level irq_chip, we may miss a number of critical flags. This patch accumulates the flags into a new set, stored at the irq_desc level, with an additional flag to indicate that this is a