On Thu 2020-10-29 23:16:01, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Dear Petr,
>
>
> Am 11.08.20 um 12:53 schrieb Petr Mladek:
> > On Tue 2020-08-11 11:29:24, Paul Menzel wrote:
> > > Commit f17a32e97e (let LOG_BUF_SHIFT default to 17) from 2008 was the
> > > last time, the the default log buffer size bump was
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 12:55 PM Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Tue 2020-08-11 11:29:24, Paul Menzel wrote:
> > Commit f17a32e97e (let LOG_BUF_SHIFT default to 17) from 2008 was the
> > last time, the the default log buffer size bump was increased.
> >
> > Machines have evolved, and on current hardware,
Dear Petr,
Am 11.08.20 um 12:53 schrieb Petr Mladek:
On Tue 2020-08-11 11:29:24, Paul Menzel wrote:
Commit f17a32e97e (let LOG_BUF_SHIFT default to 17) from 2008 was the
last time, the the default log buffer size bump was increased.
Machines have evolved, and on current hardware, enough
On Tue 2020-08-11 11:29:24, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Commit f17a32e97e (let LOG_BUF_SHIFT default to 17) from 2008 was the
> last time, the the default log buffer size bump was increased.
>
> Machines have evolved, and on current hardware, enough memory is
> present, and some devices have over 200
Commit f17a32e97e (let LOG_BUF_SHIFT default to 17) from 2008 was the
last time, the the default log buffer size bump was increased.
Machines have evolved, and on current hardware, enough memory is
present, and some devices have over 200 PCI devices, like a two socket
Skylake-E server, resulting
5 matches
Mail list logo
