Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] irqchip/ti-sci-inta: Add support for unmapped event handling

2020-10-19 Thread Peter Ujfalusi
Marc, On 30/09/2020 11.33, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 2020-09-30 08:45, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: >> The DMA (BCDMA/PKTDMA and their rings/flows) events are under the INTA's >> supervision as unmapped events in AM64. > > What does "unmapped event" mean? An event that doesn't require a mapping? > Or an

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] irqchip/ti-sci-inta: Add support for unmapped event handling

2020-10-12 Thread Peter Ujfalusi
On 12/10/2020 10.31, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 2020-10-09 09:58, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: >> Marc, >> > > [...] > >> The design of irqchip/irq-ti-sci-inta.c, soc/ti/ti_sci_inta_msi.c and >> irqchip/irq-ti-sci-intr.c created to handle the interrupt needs present >> in K3 devices with NAVSS. >>

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] irqchip/ti-sci-inta: Add support for unmapped event handling

2020-10-12 Thread Marc Zyngier
On 2020-10-09 09:58, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: Marc, [...] The design of irqchip/irq-ti-sci-inta.c, soc/ti/ti_sci_inta_msi.c and irqchip/irq-ti-sci-intr.c created to handle the interrupt needs present in K3 devices with NAVSS. DMSS of newer K3 devices extends and simplifies the NAVSS components

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] irqchip/ti-sci-inta: Add support for unmapped event handling

2020-10-09 Thread Peter Ujfalusi
Marc, On 01/10/2020 14.42, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > > > On 30/09/2020 16.13, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> On 2020-09-30 11:01, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: >>> On 30/09/2020 11.33, Marc Zyngier wrote: On 2020-09-30 08:45, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > The DMA (BCDMA/PKTDMA and their rings/flows) events

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] irqchip/ti-sci-inta: Add support for unmapped event handling

2020-10-01 Thread Peter Ujfalusi
On 30/09/2020 16.13, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 2020-09-30 11:01, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: >> On 30/09/2020 11.33, Marc Zyngier wrote: >>> On 2020-09-30 08:45, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: The DMA (BCDMA/PKTDMA and their rings/flows) events are under the INTA's supervision as unmapped events

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] irqchip/ti-sci-inta: Add support for unmapped event handling

2020-09-30 Thread Marc Zyngier
On 2020-09-30 11:01, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: On 30/09/2020 11.33, Marc Zyngier wrote: On 2020-09-30 08:45, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: The DMA (BCDMA/PKTDMA and their rings/flows) events are under the INTA's supervision as unmapped events in AM64. What does "unmapped event" mean? An event that

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] irqchip/ti-sci-inta: Add support for unmapped event handling

2020-09-30 Thread Peter Ujfalusi
On 30/09/2020 11.33, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 2020-09-30 08:45, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: >> The DMA (BCDMA/PKTDMA and their rings/flows) events are under the INTA's >> supervision as unmapped events in AM64. > > What does "unmapped event" mean? An event that doesn't require a mapping? > Or an

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] irqchip/ti-sci-inta: Add support for unmapped event handling

2020-09-30 Thread Marc Zyngier
On 2020-09-30 08:45, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: The DMA (BCDMA/PKTDMA and their rings/flows) events are under the INTA's supervision as unmapped events in AM64. What does "unmapped event" mean? An event that doesn't require a mapping? Or an internally generated event? Or a proxy event? In

[PATCH v2 2/2] irqchip/ti-sci-inta: Add support for unmapped event handling

2020-09-30 Thread Peter Ujfalusi
The DMA (BCDMA/PKTDMA and their rings/flows) events are under the INTA's supervision as unmapped events in AM64. In order to keep the current SW stack working, the INTA driver must replace the dev_id with it's own when a request comes for BCDMA or PKTDMA resources. Implement parsing of the