Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] kbuild: Remove stale asm-generic wrappers

2016-04-21 Thread James Hogan
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 09:51:07AM +, James Hogan wrote: > Hi Michal, > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 03:27:24PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Tuesday 19 January 2016 14:22:13 James Hogan wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 03:09:14PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 19

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] kbuild: Remove stale asm-generic wrappers

2016-04-21 Thread James Hogan
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 09:51:07AM +, James Hogan wrote: > Hi Michal, > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 03:27:24PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Tuesday 19 January 2016 14:22:13 James Hogan wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 03:09:14PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 19

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] kbuild: Remove stale asm-generic wrappers

2016-02-23 Thread James Hogan
Hi Michal, On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 03:27:24PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 19 January 2016 14:22:13 James Hogan wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 03:09:14PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Tuesday 19 January 2016 13:37:50 James Hogan wrote: > > > > When a header file is removed

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] kbuild: Remove stale asm-generic wrappers

2016-02-23 Thread James Hogan
Hi Michal, On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 03:27:24PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 19 January 2016 14:22:13 James Hogan wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 03:09:14PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Tuesday 19 January 2016 13:37:50 James Hogan wrote: > > > > When a header file is removed

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] kbuild: Remove stale asm-generic wrappers

2016-01-21 Thread James Hogan
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 12:03:42AM +, Paul Burton wrote: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 01:37:50PM +, James Hogan wrote: > > When a header file is removed from generic-y (often accompanied by the > > addition of an arch specific header), the generated wrapper file will > > persist, and in some

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] kbuild: Remove stale asm-generic wrappers

2016-01-21 Thread James Hogan
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 12:03:42AM +, Paul Burton wrote: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 01:37:50PM +, James Hogan wrote: > > When a header file is removed from generic-y (often accompanied by the > > addition of an arch specific header), the generated wrapper file will > > persist, and in some

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] kbuild: Remove stale asm-generic wrappers

2016-01-20 Thread Paul Burton
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 01:37:50PM +, James Hogan wrote: > When a header file is removed from generic-y (often accompanied by the > addition of an arch specific header), the generated wrapper file will > persist, and in some cases may still take precedence over the new arch > header. > > For

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] kbuild: Remove stale asm-generic wrappers

2016-01-20 Thread Florian Fainelli
Le 19/01/2016 05:37, James Hogan a écrit : > When a header file is removed from generic-y (often accompanied by the > addition of an arch specific header), the generated wrapper file will > persist, and in some cases may still take precedence over the new arch > header. > > For example commit

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] kbuild: Remove stale asm-generic wrappers

2016-01-20 Thread Florian Fainelli
Le 19/01/2016 05:37, James Hogan a écrit : > When a header file is removed from generic-y (often accompanied by the > addition of an arch specific header), the generated wrapper file will > persist, and in some cases may still take precedence over the new arch > header. > > For example commit

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] kbuild: Remove stale asm-generic wrappers

2016-01-20 Thread Paul Burton
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 01:37:50PM +, James Hogan wrote: > When a header file is removed from generic-y (often accompanied by the > addition of an arch specific header), the generated wrapper file will > persist, and in some cases may still take precedence over the new arch > header. > > For