Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mmc: sdhci-tegra: Specify valid DMA mask

On Friday 04 March 2016 15:43:56 Alexandre Courbot wrote: > > > > Yeah, I'm not too sure what is the point of setting the fake mask to > > be honest, but you are definitely right that it is a contradiction to > > call a DMA function on a device that is not DMA-capable. > > Ah, I finally got it -

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mmc: sdhci-tegra: Specify valid DMA mask

On Friday 04 March 2016 15:43:56 Alexandre Courbot wrote: > > > > Yeah, I'm not too sure what is the point of setting the fake mask to > > be honest, but you are definitely right that it is a contradiction to > > call a DMA function on a device that is not DMA-capable. > > Ah, I finally got it -

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mmc: sdhci-tegra: Specify valid DMA mask

On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Wednesday 02 March 2016 19:36:23 Alexandre Courbot wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 6:34 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>> > On

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mmc: sdhci-tegra: Specify valid DMA mask

On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Wednesday 02 March 2016 19:36:23 Alexandre Courbot wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 6:34 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>> > On Tuesday 01 March 2016 13:32:44 Alexandre Courbot

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mmc: sdhci-tegra: Specify valid DMA mask

On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 02 March 2016 19:36:23 Alexandre Courbot wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 6:34 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> > On Tuesday 01 March 2016 13:32:44 Alexandre Courbot wrote: >> >> On T210, the sdhci

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mmc: sdhci-tegra: Specify valid DMA mask

On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 02 March 2016 19:36:23 Alexandre Courbot wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 6:34 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> > On Tuesday 01 March 2016 13:32:44 Alexandre Courbot wrote: >> >> On T210, the sdhci controller can address more than 32

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mmc: sdhci-tegra: Specify valid DMA mask

On Wednesday 02 March 2016 19:36:23 Alexandre Courbot wrote: > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 6:34 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Tuesday 01 March 2016 13:32:44 Alexandre Courbot wrote: > >> On T210, the sdhci controller can address more than 32 bits of address > >> space. Failing to

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mmc: sdhci-tegra: Specify valid DMA mask

On Wednesday 02 March 2016 19:36:23 Alexandre Courbot wrote: > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 6:34 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Tuesday 01 March 2016 13:32:44 Alexandre Courbot wrote: > >> On T210, the sdhci controller can address more than 32 bits of address > >> space. Failing to express this fact

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mmc: sdhci-tegra: Specify valid DMA mask

On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 6:34 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 01 March 2016 13:32:44 Alexandre Courbot wrote: >> On T210, the sdhci controller can address more than 32 bits of address >> space. Failing to express this fact results in the use of bounce >> buffers and affects

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mmc: sdhci-tegra: Specify valid DMA mask

On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 6:34 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 01 March 2016 13:32:44 Alexandre Courbot wrote: >> On T210, the sdhci controller can address more than 32 bits of address >> space. Failing to express this fact results in the use of bounce >> buffers and affects performance. >> >>

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mmc: sdhci-tegra: Specify valid DMA mask

On Tuesday 01 March 2016 13:32:44 Alexandre Courbot wrote: > On T210, the sdhci controller can address more than 32 bits of address > space. Failing to express this fact results in the use of bounce > buffers and affects performance. > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot I

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mmc: sdhci-tegra: Specify valid DMA mask

On Tuesday 01 March 2016 13:32:44 Alexandre Courbot wrote: > On T210, the sdhci controller can address more than 32 bits of address > space. Failing to express this fact results in the use of bounce > buffers and affects performance. > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot I don't get this one.

[PATCH v2 2/2] mmc: sdhci-tegra: Specify valid DMA mask

On T210, the sdhci controller can address more than 32 bits of address space. Failing to express this fact results in the use of bounce buffers and affects performance. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot --- drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c | 8 1 file changed, 8

[PATCH v2 2/2] mmc: sdhci-tegra: Specify valid DMA mask

On T210, the sdhci controller can address more than 32 bits of address space. Failing to express this fact results in the use of bounce buffers and affects performance. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot --- drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c | 8 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git