Hi,
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 11:27:57AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Seems that the patch triggers some WARNs on my laptop.
yeah, that one is replaced with a better variant now and it should land
in the next linux-next, the one after next-20210208 :)
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
SUS
Hi,
Seems that the patch triggers some WARNs on my laptop.
For every CPU:
[0.003751] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 0 at arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:390
thermal_set_handler+0x12/0x25
[0.003751] Modules linked in:
[0.003751] CPU: 4 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/4 Tainted: GW
5.11.0-rc6-next-
On Mon, 2021-01-25 at 14:05 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From: Borislav Petkov
>
> This functionality has nothing to do with MCE, move it to the thermal
> framework and untangle it from MCE.
>
> Have thermal_set_handler() check the build-time assigned default
> handler
> stub was the one used
From: Borislav Petkov
This functionality has nothing to do with MCE, move it to the thermal
framework and untangle it from MCE.
Have thermal_set_handler() check the build-time assigned default handler
stub was the one used before therm_throt assigns a new one.
Requested-by: Peter Zijlstra
Sign
On Mon, 2021-01-25 at 18:18 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 09:14:35AM -0800, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> > Can the handler, processing architectural features via thermal
> > interrupt, reside in arch/x86 folder or need to be
> > drivers/thermal/intel?
>
> Look at...
>
>
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 09:14:35AM -0800, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> Can the handler, processing architectural features via thermal
> interrupt, reside in arch/x86 folder or need to be
> drivers/thermal/intel?
Look at...
> > > @@ -718,7 +699,7 @@ void intel_init_thermal(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>
Hi All,
On Mon, 2021-01-25 at 23:42 +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> Hi, Borislav,
>
> Thanks for the patch. CC Srinivas.
>
Thanks for adding me.
> On Mon, 2021-01-25 at 14:05 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > From: Borislav Petkov
> >
> > This functionality has nothing to do with MCE, move it to t
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 11:42:14PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> Agreed.
Ok I'll queue the stuff in tip if there are no objections. It is a lot
easier this way...
> just one question,
> there are many overlaps between this kernel thermal throttling code and
> the x86_pkg_temp_thermal driver, is it po
Hi, Borislav,
Thanks for the patch. CC Srinivas.
On Mon, 2021-01-25 at 14:05 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From: Borislav Petkov
>
> This functionality has nothing to do with MCE, move it to the thermal
> framework and untangle it from MCE.
>
Agreed.
just one question,
there are many overla
9 matches
Mail list logo
