On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 05:06:16PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Jul 2019, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> > - The majority of interval tree users (though either the
> > interval_tree.h or the interval_tree_generic.h API) do not store any
> > overlapping intervals, and as such they really d
On Tue, 02 Jul 2019, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
Ehhh, I have my own list of gripes about interval tree (I'm
responsible for some of these too):
Sorry just getting back to this.
- The majority of interval tree users (though either the
interval_tree.h or the interval_tree_generic.h API) do not s
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 9:09 AM Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
>
> On Tue, 02 Jul 2019, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
>
> >diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat_rbtree.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat_rbtree.c
> >index fa16036fa592..2afad8e869fc 100644
> >--- a/arch/x86/mm/pat_rbtree.c
> >+++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat_rbtree.c
> >@@ -54,23
On Tue, 02 Jul 2019, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat_rbtree.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat_rbtree.c
index fa16036fa592..2afad8e869fc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/pat_rbtree.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat_rbtree.c
@@ -54,23 +54,10 @@ static u64 get_subtree_max_end(struct rb_node *node)
re
Add RB_DECLARE_CALLBACKS_MAX, which generates augmented rbtree callbacks
for the case where the augmented value is a scalar whose definition
follows a max(f(node)) pattern. This actually covers all present uses
of RB_DECLARE_CALLBACKS, and saves some (source) code duplication in the
various RBCOMPU
5 matches
Mail list logo