Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mmc: sdhci-omap: drop ->get_ro() implementation

2019-02-12 Thread Kishon Vijay Abraham I
On 12/02/19 1:41 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote: > On 11/02/19 3:23 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: >> The SDHCI core is now properly checking for the state of a WP GPIO, >> so there is no longer any need for the sdhci-omap code to implement >> ->get_ro() using mmc_gpio_get_ro(). >> >> Signed-off-by: Thoma

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mmc: sdhci-omap: drop ->get_ro() implementation

2019-02-12 Thread Adrian Hunter
On 11/02/19 3:23 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > The SDHCI core is now properly checking for the state of a WP GPIO, > so there is no longer any need for the sdhci-omap code to implement > ->get_ro() using mmc_gpio_get_ro(). > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni > Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding Acked-

[PATCH v2 2/3] mmc: sdhci-omap: drop ->get_ro() implementation

2019-02-11 Thread Thomas Petazzoni
The SDHCI core is now properly checking for the state of a WP GPIO, so there is no longer any need for the sdhci-omap code to implement ->get_ro() using mmc_gpio_get_ro(). Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding --- Changes since v1: - Added Reviewed-by from Thierry Reding -